- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Li Shen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Is this linguist sufficiently notable? I don't think so, and the links listed in the article are dead links, as well as the interwiki link to Chinese Wikipedia. (I will say, though, that it is possible my judgment is slightly clouded by the fact that I think the space needs to be vacated for a Tang Dynasty chancellor, whose name is also transliterated Li Shen. See 李紳. The current links to this article are actually intended for the chancellor.) Delete. Nlu (talk) 05:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't appear to meet notability requirements for academics. Eeekster (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't seem to be notable enough.--Staberinde (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.